CourtMesh

WP/5942/2004 of PRINCE SHIVAJI MARATHA BOARDING HOUSE'S COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE and ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS

Bombay High CourtWP

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 8 September 2004. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM070202242004. It was heard by Justice S.U. Kamdar,hon'Ble Shri Justice A.P. Shah.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The court quashed the order reducing the intake capacity from 40 to 30 and upheld the aut…". The record refers to 2 enactments, among them All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 and Architects Act, 1972. 15 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtBombay High Court
Record typeWP
Case numberCNR HCBM070202242004
Date of decision
Decision year2004
BenchHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.U. KAMDAR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.P. SHAH
PetitionerPRINCE SHIVAJI MARATHA BOARDING HOUSE'S COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE and ANR.
RespondentSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS.
DisposalThe court quashed the order reducing the intake capacity from 40 to 30 and upheld the authority of the Council of Archi…
Acts
Sections
  • Section 2(g)
  • Section 2(h)
  • Section 14(1)
  • Section 17
  • Section 18
  • Section 19
  • Section 20
  • Section 21
  • Section 22
  • Section 23
  • Section 45
  • Section 45(2)
  • Section 45(e)
  • Section 45(f)
  • Section 45(g)

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.