CourtMesh

AELEP/13/2007 of SHRI. DAYANAND NARVEKAR vs SMT. FERMEENA P. KHAUNTE

Bombay High CourtAELEP

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 10 October 2008. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM050031872007. It was heard by Justice N. A. Britto.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Objections overruled; petition allowed to proceed with filing of affidavit in form No.25;…". The record refers to the Representation of the People Act, 1951. 20 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtBombay High Court
Record typeAELEP
Case numberCNR HCBM050031872007
Date of decision
Decision year2008
BenchN. A. BRITTO
PetitionerSHRI. DAYANAND NARVEKAR
RespondentSMT. FERMEENA P. KHAUNTE
DisposalObjections overruled; petition allowed to proceed with filing of affidavit in form No.25; certain pleadings struck off
ActsRepresentation of the People Act, 1951
Sections
  • Section 83
  • Section 86
  • Section 100(1)(b)
  • Section 100(1)(d)(iv)
  • Section 123
  • Section 126
  • Section 33A
  • Section 77
  • Section 125-A
  • Order VII, Rule 11
  • Order VI, Rule 10
  • Order VI, Rule 15
  • Order VI, Rule 15(2)
  • Order VI, Rule 16
  • Order VI, Rule 4
  • Order VI, Rule 1
  • Order VI, Rule 3
  • Section 81
  • Section 81(1)
  • Section 81(3)

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues
LockedArgumentsLockedHoldingLockedLegal PrinciplesLockedCase History with OrdersLockedSimilar CasesLockedFull judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.