CourtMesh

APEAL/866/2009 of THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs PRAGYASINH CHANDRAPALSINH THAKUR AND ORS

Bombay High CourtAPEAL

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 19 July 2010. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM010298272009. It was heard by Justice B.H. Marlapalle,hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Orders quashed and cases remanded for re-evaluation". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act), Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Arms Act. 9 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtBombay High Court
Record typeAPEAL
Case numberCNR HCBM010298272009
Date of decision
Decision year2010
BenchHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.H. MARLAPALLE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANOOP V. MOHTA
PetitionerTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RespondentPRAGYASINH CHANDRAPALSINH THAKUR AND ORS
DisposalOrders quashed and cases remanded for re-evaluation
Acts
Sections
  • Sections 3(1)(i), 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4), 3(5) of MCOC Act
  • Sections 302, 307, 326, 324, 427, 153-A, 120-B of IPC
  • Sections 25(1), 25(3) of Arms Act
  • Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 of Explosive Substances Act
  • Sections 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 23 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
  • Section 227 of Cr.P.C.
  • Section 11 of MCOC Act
  • Section 23(1)(a), 23(2) of MCOC Act
  • Section 190, 196, 209, 200, 156(3), 202, 190, 196, 209, 200, 156(3), 202 of Cr.P.C.

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues
LockedArgumentsLockedHoldingLockedLegal PrinciplesLockedCase History with OrdersLockedSimilar CasesLockedFull judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.