APP/1118/2001 of N.T.C.(S.M.) LTD vs KAMALA SINGH and ORS
Bombay High CourtAPP
About this record
The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 23 June 2017. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM020057882001. It was heard by Justice Anuja Prabhudessai,hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka.
The disposal recorded by the registry is "The appeal was partly allowed; the orders directing the appellant to desist from unfair l…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and Sick Textile Undertaking (Nationalisation) Act, 1974. 1 statutory provision is noted on the record.
Court record
| Court | Bombay High Court |
|---|---|
| Record type | APP |
| Case number | CNR HCBM020057882001 |
| Date of decision | |
| Decision year | 2017 |
| Bench | HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. OKA |
| Petitioner | N.T.C.(S.M.) LTD |
| Respondent | KAMALA SINGH and ORS |
| Disposal | The appeal was partly allowed; the orders directing the appellant to desist from unfair labour practices and to give be… |
| Acts | |
| Sections | Section 12 of the Employee Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 |
These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.
How to refer to this record
These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.
- Registry identifier: CNR HCBM020057882001
- Court and date: Bombay High Court, 23 June 2017
- Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/bombay-high-court/2017/app-1118-2001-of-n-t-c-s-m-ltd-vs-kamala-singh-and-ors-2017-e7e92d
Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.
Inside the full case file
See the rest of this matter
The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:
- The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
- Every order and document on the record, ready to read
- The full judgment exactly as the court published it
- AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountThe same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.