CourtMesh

APEAL/1110/2022 of MOHAMMED ZAKIR ABDUL HAQUE SHAIKH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Bombay High CourtAPEAL

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 2 March 2023. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM010441192022. It was heard by Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'Ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Bail granted subject to conditions". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Indian Penal Code, Arms Act and Explosives Act, 1884. 14 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtBombay High Court
Record typeAPEAL
Case numberCNR HCBM010441192022
Date of decision
Decision year2023
BenchHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH D. NAIK
PetitionerMOHAMMED ZAKIR ABDUL HAQUE SHAIKH
RespondentSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DisposalBail granted subject to conditions
Acts
Sections
  • 295(A)
  • 505(2)
  • 507
  • 506(II)
  • 120(B)
  • 121
  • 122
  • 286
  • Sec 3, 25 of the Arms Act
  • Section 6 & 9(B) of the Explosives Act
  • Section 4 & 5 of the Explosive Substance Act
  • Section 13(1)(a)(b), 16, 18, 19, 20 of UAPA
  • Section 66 of the Information Technology Act
  • Section 43D(5) of UAPA

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues
LockedArgumentsLockedHoldingLockedLegal PrinciplesLockedCase History with OrdersLockedSimilar CasesLockedFull judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.