CourtMesh

APEAL/278/2024 of PRALHAD DAYARAM DHORE AND ANOTHAER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO PS KHADAN AKOLA AND ANOTHER

Bombay High CourtAPEAL

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 21 August 2024. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM040138492024. It was heard by Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The court allowed the appeal, set aside the rejection of anticipatory bail, and granted b…". The record refers to 2 enactments, among them Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Indian Penal Code. 3 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtBombay High Court
Record typeAPEAL
Case numberCNR HCBM040138492024
Date of decision
Decision year2024
BenchHON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE
PetitionerPRALHAD DAYARAM DHORE AND ANOTHAER
RespondentTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PSO PS KHADAN AKOLA AND ANOTHER
DisposalThe court allowed the appeal, set aside the rejection of anticipatory bail, and granted bail with conditions.
Acts
Sections
  • Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
  • Sections 323, 325, 365, 504, 506 of IPC
  • Sections 3(2)(va), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(v) of the SC/ST Act

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.