CourtMesh

ABA/451/2025 of SHRINIVAS VYENKATESH KOTTAWADLAWAR AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. RANGE FOREST OFFICER, AHERI FOREST DIVISION-ALAPPLI

Bombay High CourtABA

About this record

The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 17 July 2025. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM040194012025. It was heard by Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Partly Allowed; anticipatory bail granted to applicant No.2, application for applicant No…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Indian Forest Act, 1927, Maharashtra Forest Rules, 2014 and Bombay Forest Rules, 1942. 3 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtBombay High Court
Record typeABA
Case numberCNR HCBM040194012025
Date of decision
Decision year2025
BenchHON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE
PetitionerSHRINIVAS VYENKATESH KOTTAWADLAWAR AND ANR.
RespondentTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. RANGE FOREST OFFICER, AHERI FOREST DIVISION-ALAPPLI
DisposalPartly Allowed; anticipatory bail granted to applicant No.2, application for applicant No.1 not pressed and disposed of
Acts
Sections
  • Sections 41(2)(b,c), 42, 53, 69 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927
  • Rule 31 of the Maharashtra Forest Rules, 2014
  • Rule 66 of the Bombay Forest Rules, 1942

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.