WP/256/2017 of GAJANAN S/O. SRIRAM HATELE AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS DEPT., MANTRALAYA MUMBAI AND OTHERS
Bombay High CourtWP
About this record
The Bombay High Court decided this matter on 24 December 2025. The registry identifies it as CNR HCBM040087292017. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Anil L. Pansare and Justice Raj D. Wakode.
The disposal recorded by the registry is "Petitions dismissed; directions for State to consider representations". The record refers to 5 enactments, among them Bihar Development of Ayurvedic and Unani Systems of Medicine Act, 1951, Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 and Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961. 1 statutory provision is noted on the record.
Court record
| Court | Bombay High Court |
|---|---|
| Record type | WP |
| Case number | CNR HCBM040087292017 |
| Date of decision | |
| Decision year | 2025 |
| Bench | |
| Petitioner | GAJANAN S/O. SRIRAM HATELE AND OTHERS |
| Respondent | STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS DEPT., MANTRALAYA MUMBAI AND OTHERS |
| Disposal | Petitions dismissed; directions for State to consider representations |
| Acts | |
| Sections | Section 33 of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961 |
These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.
How to refer to this record
These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.
- Registry identifier: CNR HCBM040087292017
- Court and date: Bombay High Court, 24 December 2025
- Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/bombay-high-court/2025/wp-256-2017-of-gajanan-s-o-sriram-hatele-and-others-vs-state-of-2025-54aff7
Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Bombay High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Bombay High Court data coverage.
Inside the full case file
See the rest of this matter
The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:
- The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
- Every order and document on the record, ready to read
- The full judgment exactly as the court published it
- AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountThe same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.