CourtMesh

APO/89/2020 of UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED vs ARVIND KUMAR NEWAR AND ORS

Calcutta High CourtAPO

About this record

The Calcutta High Court decided this matter on 14 December 2023. The registry identifies it as CNR WBCHCO0011742020. It was heard by Justice T.S Sivagnanam,hon'Ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals disposed with modifications to order". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Indian Succession Act, 1925, Companies Act, 2013 and Companies Act, 1956. 21 statutory provisions are noted on the record. The registry holds 180 order documents on the matter.

Court record

Court record details
CourtCalcutta High Court
Record typeAPO
Case numberCNR WBCHCO0011742020
Date of decision
Decision year2023
BenchTHE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
PetitionerUNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED
RespondentARVIND KUMAR NEWAR AND ORS
DisposalAppeals disposed with modifications to order
Orders on record180
Acts
Sections
  • Section 247 Indian Succession Act
  • Section 2(h) Indian Succession Act
  • Section 5 Indian Succession Act
  • Section 247(1A) Companies Act, 1956
  • Section 211 Indian Succession Act
  • Section 30 Hindu Succession Act
  • Section 47 Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 88 Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 2(27) Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 152 Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 101 Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 48 Indian Trust Act, 1882
  • Section 89 Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 90 Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 187C Companies Act, 1956
  • Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC
  • Section 114 Companies Act, 2013
  • Section 12(c) Partnership Act, 1932
  • Section 17(3) Waqf Act, 1995
  • Sections 7(6), 35(1), 42(10), 120(4) Companies Act, 2013

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Calcutta High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Calcutta High Court data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.