CourtMesh

CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF ODISHA vs BHARAT PROCESS AND MECHNICAL ENGINEERS LTD

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 17 May 2024. Its neutral citation is 2024 INSC 440. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Chief Justice.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals dismissed; lease renewal rejected". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Minerals (Other than Atomic Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016, Minerals and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Companies Act, 1956. 14 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2024 INSC 440
Diary numberDiary No. 28856/2020
Date of decision
Decision year2024
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
PetitionerCHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF ODISHA
RespondentBHARAT PROCESS AND MECHNICAL ENGINEERS LTD.
DisposalAppeals dismissed; lease renewal rejected
Reportingnon-reportable
Acts
  • Minerals (Other than Atomic Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016
  • Minerals and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
  • Companies Act, 1956
  • Companies Act, 2013
  • Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985
  • Bird and Company Limited (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking and Other Properties) Act, 1980
Sections
  • Section 3
  • Section 7
  • Section 78
  • Section 201
  • Section 446(2)(d)
  • Section 457(1)(b)
  • Section 457(2)(5)(2)
  • Rule 72
  • Rule 23
  • Rule 154
  • Rule 156
  • Rule 179
  • Rule 154 of the Company (Cal) Rules, 1959
  • Section 4A(4)

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.