CourtMesh

SUKANYA SHANTHA vs UNION OF INDIA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 3 October 2024. Its neutral citation is 2024 INSC 753. The bench of 3 comprised Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Justice Chief Justice and Justice Manoj Misra.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The impugned provisions are declared unconstitutional; directions issued for reform and c…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Prison Act, 1984, Model Prison Manual 2016 and Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. 8 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2024 INSC 753
Diary numberDiary No. 51059/2023
Date of decision
Decision year2024
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
PetitionerSUKANYA SHANTHA
RespondentUNION OF INDIA
DisposalThe impugned provisions are declared unconstitutional; directions issued for reform and compliance within three months.
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Prison Act, 1984
  • Model Prison Manual 2016
  • Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Their Rehabilitation Act, 2013
  • Criminal Tribes Act, 1871
  • Criminal Tribes (Repeal) Act, 1952
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
  • Hindu Succession Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
Sections
  • Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, 23 of the Constitution of India
  • Section 19, Criminal Tribes Act, 1871
  • Section 3, Criminal Tribes (Repeal) Act, 1952
  • Section 15A, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
  • Section 122, Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 565, Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 6, Andhra Pradesh Habitual Offenders Act, 1962
  • Section 2(12), Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.