CourtMesh

THE CHIEF MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs M/S AD BUREAU ADVERTISING PVT LTD

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 28 February 2025. Its neutral citation is 2025 INSC 288. The bench of 2 comprised Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Supreme Court set aside the order of the NCDRC on the ground of lack of jurisdiction,…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. 3 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Neutral citation2025 INSC 288
Diary numberDiary No. 43618/2023
Date of decision
Decision year2025
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
PetitionerTHE CHIEF MANAGER CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
RespondentM/S AD BUREAU ADVERTISING PVT LTD
DisposalThe Supreme Court set aside the order of the NCDRC on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, and dismissed the appeal conc…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Consumer Protection Act, 1986
  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
  • Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993
Sections
  • Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
  • Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
  • Section 19(1) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.