CourtMesh

LRRP/4122/1989 of Vs

High Court of KarnatakaLRRP

About this record

The High Court of Karnataka decided this matter on 16 April 1998. The registry identifies it as CNR KAHC010007411989. It was heard by Justice Venkatesha Murthy.S.R.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Revision petitions dismissed with costs". The record refers to 2 enactments, among them Karnataka Land Reforms Act and Bombay Tenancy Act of 1939.

Court record

Court record details
CourtHigh Court of Karnataka
Record typeLRRP
Case numberCNR KAHC010007411989
Date of decision
Decision year1998
BenchVENKATESHA MURTHY.S.R
DisposalRevision petitions dismissed with costs
Acts

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the High Court of Karnataka. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also High Court of Karnataka data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.