WP/46781/2016 of THE HONBLE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR vs SRI NANJUNDA SHETTY
High Court of KarnatakaWP
About this record
The High Court of Karnataka decided this matter on 5 January 2026. The registry identifies it as CNR KAHC010170372016. The bench of 2 comprised Justice S.G.Pandit and Justice K. V. Aravind.
The disposal recorded by the registry is "The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Tribunal’s order.". The record refers to the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957. 1 statutory provision is noted on the record.
Court record
| Court | High Court of Karnataka |
|---|---|
| Record type | WP |
| Case number | CNR KAHC010170372016 |
| Date of decision | |
| Decision year | 2026 |
| Bench | |
| Petitioner | THE HONBLE ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR |
| Respondent | SRI NANJUNDA SHETTY |
| Disposal | The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Tribunal’s order. |
| Acts | Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 |
| Sections | Rule 8(vi) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 |
These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.
How to refer to this record
These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.
- Registry identifier: CNR KAHC010170372016
- Court and date: High Court of Karnataka, 5 January 2026
- Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/karnataka-high-court/2026/wp-46781-2016-of-the-honble-additional-registrar-vs-sri-nanjunda-2026-e3e689
Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the High Court of Karnataka. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also High Court of Karnataka data coverage.
Inside the full case file
See the rest of this matter
The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:
- The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
- Every order and document on the record, ready to read
- The full judgment exactly as the court published it
- AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountThe same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.