WP(C)/7674/2025 of HIRANMAYEE NAYAK vs STATE OF ODISHA Advocate- M/S. Mr. A. K. Chhatoi P.K.Sinha S.Mahapatra P.K.Patra,M/S. Pami Rath P.Mohanty M.Jena J.Mohanty,Purna Chndra Das, Satyajeet Das (Intervenors),M/S. Tanmay Mishra, Sangram Senapati(Intrevenors),Sangram Kumar Singh 1123

Orissa High CourtWP(C)22 January 2026

About this record

The Orissa High Court decided this matter on 22 January 2026. The registry identifies it as CNR ODHC010186542025. It was heard by Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Clarifications quashed; directions issued to State". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Indira Sawhney Judgment, Constitution of India and Orissa Civil Services (Criteria for Promotion) Rules, 1992. 9 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
Court	Orissa High Court
Record type	WP(C)
Case number	CNR ODHC010186542025
Date of decision	22 January 2026
Decision year	2026
Bench	MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Petitioner	HIRANMAYEE NAYAK
Respondent	STATE OF ODISHA Advocate- M/S. Mr. A. K. Chhatoi P.K.Sinha S.Mahapatra P.K.Patra,M/S. Pami Rath P.Mohanty M.Jena J.Mohanty,Purna Chndra Das, Satyajeet Das (Intervenors),M/S. Tanmay Mishra, Sangram Senapati(Intrevenors),Sangram Kumar Singh 1123
Disposal	Clarifications quashed; directions issued to State
Acts	Indira Sawhney Judgment Constitution of India Orissa Civil Services (Criteria for Promotion) Rules, 1992 Orissa Reservation of Vacancies in Posts and Services (For Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) Act, 1975 Constitution (Seventy-seventh Amendment) Act, 1995 Constitution (Eighty-fifth Amendment) Act, 2001 Reservation Act, 2018 Karnataka Determination of Seniority of the Government Servants Promoted on the basis of Reservation Act, 2002
Sections	Article 154 Article 162 Article 16(4) Article 16(4-A) Article 16(4-B) Article 335 Section 10 of Orissa Act 38 of 1975 Rule-3-A of the Amended Rules, 2022 Rule-6 of the 1992 Rules
Provisions on CourtMesh	Article 16, The Constitution of India Article 335, The Constitution of India

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Registry identifier: CNR ODHC010186542025
Court and date: Orissa High Court, 22 January 2026
Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/orissa-high-court/2026/wp-c-7674-2025-of-hiranmayee-nayak-vs-state-of-odisha-advocate-m-s-mr-2026-90bd81

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Orissa High Court. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also High Court of Orissa data coverage.

Inside the full case file

HeadnoteUnlocks with a free account

Key Facts

Legal Issues

Arguments Holding Legal Principles Case History with Orders Similar Cases Full judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
Every order and document on the record, ready to read
The full judgment exactly as the court published it
AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.