CourtMesh

CMA/4379/2024 of EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PHED vs SACHDEVA METAL WORKS

High Court of RajasthanCMA

About this record

The High Court of Rajasthan decided this matter on 15 October 2025. The registry identifies it as CNR RJHC020886492024. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Justice Baljinder Singh Sandhu.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals dismissed with directions to approach appropriate forum within three months". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 and Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. 10 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtHigh Court of Rajasthan
Record typeCMA
Case numberCNR RJHC020886492024
Date of decision
Decision year2025
Bench
PetitionerEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PHED
RespondentSACHDEVA METAL WORKS
DisposalAppeals dismissed with directions to approach appropriate forum within three months
Acts
  • Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
  • Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Sections
  • Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
  • Section 18 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006
  • Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Section 20(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
  • Section 24 of the MSMED Act, 2006
  • Section 23 of the Contract Act
  • Section 15 to 23 of the MSMED Act, 2006
  • Section 18(1), 18(2), 18(3), 18(4) of the MSMED Act, 2006
  • Section 16 of the Arbitration Act, 1996

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the High Court of Rajasthan. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also High Court of Rajasthan data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.