CourtMesh

CW/7169/2016 of STATE BANK OF INDIA vs BABU LAL MEENA SON OF (LATE) SHRI PANCHURAM MEENA

High Court of RajasthanCW

About this record

The High Court of Rajasthan decided this matter on 30 October 2025. The registry identifies it as CNR RJHC020714772016. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Baljinder Singh Sandhu.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Declaration of respondent as vexatious litigant; prohibition on institution or continuati…". The record refers to 2 enactments, among them Rajasthan Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 2015 and Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 5 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtHigh Court of Rajasthan
Record typeCW
Case numberCNR RJHC020714772016
Date of decision
Decision year2025
Bench
PetitionerSTATE BANK OF INDIA
RespondentBABU LAL MEENA SON OF (LATE) SHRI PANCHURAM MEENA
DisposalDeclaration of respondent as vexatious litigant; prohibition on institution or continuation of proceedings without leave
Acts
Sections
  • Section 2(1)(C) of the Rajasthan Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 2015
  • Section 3 of the Rajasthan Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 2015
  • Section 5 of the Rajasthan Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 2015
  • Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
  • Section 195 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the High Court of Rajasthan. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also High Court of Rajasthan data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.