CourtMesh

ABU SALEM ABDUL QAYOOM ANSARI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 10 September 2010. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 22342/2006. It was heard by Justice P. Sathasivam,asok Kumar Ganguly.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals and writ petition dismissed; trial to proceed expeditiously". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Indian Penal Code and Arms Act, 1959. 11 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 22342/2006
Date of decision
Decision year2010
BenchP. SATHASIVAM,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
PetitionerABU SALEM ABDUL QAYOOM ANSARI
RespondentSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
DisposalAppeals and writ petition dismissed; trial to proceed expeditiously
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act, 1959
  • Explosive Substances Act, 1908
  • Explosives Act, 1884
  • Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984
  • Extradition Act, 1962
  • Passport Act, 1967
Sections
  • Section 21 of the Extradition Act, 1962
  • Section 19 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987
  • Section 120B IPC
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • Section 387 IPC
  • Section 386 IPC
  • Section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908
  • Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908
  • Section 25(1A), (1B) of the Arms Act, 1959
  • Section 9B of the Explosives Act, 1884

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.