CourtMesh

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA vs ABU SALEM ABDUL KAYYUM ANSARI & ORS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 5 October 2010. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 33737/2008. It was heard by Justice P. Sathasivam,r.M. Lodha.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Order quashing the order allowing cross-examination of approver after pardon revocation". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Indian Penal Code. 10 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 33737/2008
Date of decision
Decision year2010
BenchP. SATHASIVAM,R.M. LODHA
PetitionerSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RespondentABU SALEM ABDUL KAYYUM ANSARI & ORS.
DisposalOrder quashing the order allowing cross-examination of approver after pardon revocation
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
Sections
  • Section 19 of TADA Act
  • Section 308 of Cr.P.C.
  • Section 306 of Cr.P.C.
  • Section 307 of Cr.P.C.
  • Section 308 of Cr.P.C.
  • Section 162 of Cr.P.C.
  • Section 15 of TADA Act
  • Section 164 of Cr.P.C.
  • Section 195 and 340 of Cr.P.C.
  • Article 20(3) of the Constitution
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.