CourtMesh

K.T. PLANTATION PVT. LTD. & ANR vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 9 August 2011. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 20082/2002. It was heard by Justice S.H. Kapadia,mukundakam Sharma,k.S. Radhakrishnan,swatanter Kumar,anil R. Dave.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals dismissed; legislation upheld". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Land Reforms Act, 1961, Roerich and Devika Rani Roerich Estate (Acquisition & Transfer) Act, 1996 and General Clauses Act, 1897. 12 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 20082/2002
Date of decision
Decision year2011
BenchS.H. KAPADIA,MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,SWATANTER KUMAR,ANIL R. DAVE
PetitionerK.T. PLANTATION PVT. LTD. & ANR.
RespondentSTATE OF KARNATAKA
DisposalAppeals dismissed; legislation upheld
Acts
  • Land Reforms Act, 1961
  • Roerich and Devika Rani Roerich Estate (Acquisition & Transfer) Act, 1996
  • General Clauses Act, 1897
Sections
  • Section 66
  • Section 107(1)(vi)
  • Section 110
  • Section 79B
  • Section 80
  • Section 140
  • Section 83
  • Section 66 to 76
  • Section 72
  • Section 107(2)
  • Clause (a) of Clause (1) of Article 31A
  • Article 300A

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.