BANGALORE CITY COOP HSG.SOCY.LTD vs STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment2 February 2012

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 2 February 2012. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 16825/1999. It was heard by Justice G.S. Singhvi,asok Kumar Ganguly.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals dismissed; land acquisition declared invalid due to procedural and substantive vi…". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Karnataka Housing Board Act. 15 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
Court	Supreme Court of India
Record type	Judgment
Diary number	Diary No. 16825/1999
Date of decision	2 February 2012
Decision year	2012
Bench	G.S. SINGHVI,ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Petitioner	BANGALORE CITY COOP HSG.SOCY.LTD.
Respondent	STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
Disposal	Appeals dismissed; land acquisition declared invalid due to procedural and substantive violations
Reporting	reportable
Acts	Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Karnataka Housing Board Act Societies Registration Act, 1860
Sections	Section 3 Section 4 Section 6 Section 16 Section 39 Section 40 Section 41 Section 42 Section 48(1) Section 3(f)(vi) Section 3(cc) Section 3(e) Section 17 Section 18 Section 19

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Registry identifier: Diary No. 16825/1999
Court and date: Supreme Court of India, 2 February 2012
Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/supreme-court/2012/bangalore-city-coop-hsg-socy-ltd-vs-state-of-karnataka-and-ors-2012-4d7002

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

HeadnoteUnlocks with a free account

Key Facts

Legal Issues

Arguments Holding Legal Principles Case History with Orders Similar Cases Full judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
Every order and document on the record, ready to read
The full judgment exactly as the court published it
AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.