CourtMesh

MOHD.SAEED SIDDIQUI vs STATE OF U.P.& ANR

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 24 April 2014. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 29738/2012. It was heard by Justice P Sathasivam,ranjan Gogoi,n.V. Ramana.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The writ petitions are dismissed; the law and appointment are upheld.". The record refers to 2 enactments, among them Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta and Up-Lokayuktas Act, 1975 and Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta and Up-Lokayuktas (Amendment) Act, 2012. 8 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 29738/2012
Date of decision
Decision year2014
BenchP SATHASIVAM,RANJAN GOGOI,N.V. RAMANA
PetitionerMOHD.SAEED SIDDIQUI
RespondentSTATE OF U.P.& ANR
DisposalThe writ petitions are dismissed; the law and appointment are upheld.
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta and Up-Lokayuktas Act, 1975
  • Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta and Up-Lokayuktas (Amendment) Act, 2012
Sections
  • Article 32
  • Article 199
  • Article 212
  • Section 5(1)
  • Section 5(3)
  • Section 13
  • Section 20A
  • Section 20-A
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.