CourtMesh

RIPUSUDAN DAYAL & ORS vs STATE OF M.P. & ORS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 25 February 2014. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 32010/2007. It was heard by Justice P Sathasivam,ranjan Gogoi,shiva Kirti Singh.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The impugned notices and letters issued by the Vidhan Sabha Secretary were quashed.". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Constitution of India, Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Evam Uplokayukt Act, 1981 and Madhya Pradesh Vidhan Sabha Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business, 1964. 8 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 32010/2007
Date of decision
Decision year2014
BenchP SATHASIVAM,RANJAN GOGOI,SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
PetitionerRIPUSUDAN DAYAL & ORS.
RespondentSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.
DisposalThe impugned notices and letters issued by the Vidhan Sabha Secretary were quashed.
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Constitution of India
  • Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Evam Uplokayukt Act, 1981
  • Madhya Pradesh Vidhan Sabha Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business, 1964
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
  • Central Provinces and Berar Special Police Establishment Act, 1947
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Sections
  • Article 32 of the Constitution of India
  • Articles 14, 19, 21, 194(3) of the Constitution of India
  • Section 11(1), 11(2), 11(3) of the Madhya Pradesh Lokayukt Act, 2000
  • Section 3 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
  • Section 3 of the Central Provinces and Berar Special Police Establishment Act, 1947
  • Section 4 of the SPE Act
  • Section 7 of the Lokayukt Act
  • Section 16, 19, 22 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.