CourtMesh

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA vs PAN ASIA ADVISORS LTD. & ANR

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 6 July 2015. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 33870/2013. It was heard by Justice Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla,shiva Kirti Singh.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Order in favor of SEBI; order of majority Tribunal set aside; case remanded for merits". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and Companies Act, 1956. 7 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 33870/2013
Date of decision
Decision year2015
BenchFAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA,SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
PetitionerSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA
RespondentPAN ASIA ADVISORS LTD. & ANR
DisposalOrder in favor of SEBI; order of majority Tribunal set aside; case remanded for merits
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
  • Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956
  • Companies Act, 1956
  • Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999
Sections
  • Section 2(h) of Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956
  • Section 11, 11B, 11C, 12, 12A of SEBI Act, 1992
  • Section 77(2) of Companies Act
  • Regulation 2(1)(b), (c), (3), (4), (5) of SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003
  • Regulation 5(1), (2) of FEMA Regulations, 2000
  • Paragraph 2(c), 3(1), 4(1)-(3), 6 of 1993 Scheme
  • Paragraph 4(2)-(3) of RBI Master Circular on Foreign Investment

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.