UNION OF INDIA & ORS vs ANGAD SINGH TITARIA
Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment
About this record
The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 24 February 2015. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 35734/2011. It was heard by Justice Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya,n.V. Ramana.
The disposal recorded by the registry is "The appeal is dismissed; the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal is upheld, and the respon…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Pension Regulations for Indian Air Force, 1961, Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 and Regulations for Medical Services, Armed Forces, 1983. 2 statutory provisions are noted on the record.
Court record
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
|---|---|
| Record type | Judgment |
| Diary number | Diary No. 35734/2011 |
| Date of decision | |
| Decision year | 2015 |
| Bench | SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,N.V. RAMANA |
| Petitioner | UNION OF INDIA & ORS. |
| Respondent | ANGAD SINGH TITARIA |
| Disposal | The appeal is dismissed; the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal is upheld, and the respondent is entitled to disability… |
| Reporting | reportable |
| Acts |
|
| Sections |
|
These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.
How to refer to this record
These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.
- Registry identifier: Diary No. 35734/2011
- Court and date: Supreme Court of India, 24 February 2015
- Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/supreme-court/2015/union-of-india-and-ors-vs-angad-singh-titaria-2015-4cf1b2
Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.
Inside the full case file
See the rest of this matter
The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:
- The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
- Every order and document on the record, ready to read
- The full judgment exactly as the court published it
- AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountThe same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.