LALITA RAMESH LASE & ORS vs JAIRAJ KANTILAL SONAWALA & ORS
Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment
About this record
The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 16 December 2016. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 32590/2013. It was heard by Justice Dipak Misra,amitava Roy.
The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, affirming the judgments of the H…". The record refers to the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948. 1 statutory provision is noted on the record.
Court record
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
|---|---|
| Record type | Judgment |
| Diary number | Diary No. 32590/2013 |
| Date of decision | |
| Decision year | 2016 |
| Bench | DIPAK MISRA,AMITAVA ROY |
| Petitioner | LALITA RAMESH LASE & ORS. |
| Respondent | JAIRAJ KANTILAL SONAWALA & ORS. |
| Disposal | The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, affirming the judgments of the High Court and lower courts, an… |
| Reporting | reportable |
| Acts | Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 |
| Sections | Section 70(B) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 |
These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.
How to refer to this record
These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.
- Registry identifier: Diary No. 32590/2013
- Court and date: Supreme Court of India, 16 December 2016
- Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/supreme-court/2016/lalita-ramesh-lase-and-ors-vs-jairaj-kantilal-sonawala-and-ors-2016-48d6c2
Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.
Inside the full case file
See the rest of this matter
The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:
- The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
- Every order and document on the record, ready to read
- The full judgment exactly as the court published it
- AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountThe same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.