CourtMesh

INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION vs THE STATE OF KERALA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 28 September 2018. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 18956/2006. The bench of 5 comprised Justice Chief Justice, Justice Chief Justice, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice Indu Malhotra and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court struck down the restrictions, declared Rule 3(b) and notifications invalid, and…". The record refers to 5 enactments, among them Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act, 1965, Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorization of Entry) Rules, 1965 and Travancore - Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950. 5 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 18956/2006
Date of decision
Decision year2018
Bench
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
PetitionerINDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION
RespondentTHE STATE OF KERALA
DisposalThe Court struck down the restrictions, declared Rule 3(b) and notifications invalid, and held that women of all ages h…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act, 1965
  • Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorization of Entry) Rules, 1965
  • Travancore - Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950
  • Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955
  • Indian Penal Code (various sections on social discrimination and untouchability)
Sections
  • Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, 25, 26, 29, 30, 32 of the Constitution of India
  • Article 290A
  • Section 3, 4 of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act, 1965
  • Section 2(c), 3, 4 of the same Act
  • Section 3(b) of the Rules, 1965
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.