CourtMesh

PUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION vs UNION OF INDIA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 25 September 2018. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 36674/2011. The bench of 5 comprised Justice Chief Justice, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice Indu Malhotra, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice Chief Justice.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court disposed of the petitions by urging Parliament to legislate for disqualificatio…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Representation of the People Act, 1951, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. 20 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 36674/2011
Date of decision
Decision year2018
Bench
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
PetitionerPUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION
RespondentUNION OF INDIA
DisposalThe Court disposed of the petitions by urging Parliament to legislate for disqualification measures and directed the El…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Representation of the People Act, 1951
  • Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
  • Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
  • Religious Institutions (Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1988
  • Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991
  • Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971
  • Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
  • Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.)
Sections
  • Article 102
  • Article 191
  • Article 246
  • Schedule VII, List I Entry 97
  • Section 7
  • Section 8
  • Section 8A
  • Section 9
  • Section 9A
  • Section 10
  • Section 10A
  • Section 33A
  • Section 125A
  • Section 125
  • Section 135
  • Section 135A
  • Section 136
  • Section 173
  • Section 190
  • Section 190(1)(a)(b)(c)
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.