CourtMesh

COMPETENT AUTHORITY CALCUTTA, UNDER LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) ACT 1976 AND ANR vs DAVID MANTOSH AND ORS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 26 February 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 32035/2014. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals Allowed; Civil Suit Dismissed". The record refers to the Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976. 32 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 32035/2014
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
PetitionerCOMPETENT AUTHORITY CALCUTTA, UNDER LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) ACT 1976 AND ANR.
RespondentDAVID MANTOSH AND ORS.
DisposalAppeals Allowed; Civil Suit Dismissed
Reportingreportable
ActsLand (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976
Sections
  • Section 2(o)
  • Section 2(n)
  • Section 2(i)
  • Section 2(l)
  • Section 4
  • Section 6(1)
  • Section 8
  • Section 9
  • Section 10
  • Section 10(1)
  • Section 10(3)
  • Section 12(4)
  • Section 13
  • Section 33(3)
  • Section 33(1)
  • Section 42
  • Section 43
  • Section 44
  • Section 45
  • Section 46

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.