DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs VIRENDER LAL BAHRI
Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment
About this record
The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 27 February 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 18941/2016. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman.
The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Supreme Court upheld the interpretation that the proviso to Section 24(2) is a provis…". The record refers to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 1 statutory provision is noted on the record.
Court record
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
|---|---|
| Record type | Judgment |
| Diary number | Diary No. 18941/2016 |
| Date of decision | |
| Decision year | 2019 |
| Bench |
|
| Petitioner | DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY |
| Respondent | VIRENDER LAL BAHRI |
| Disposal | The Supreme Court upheld the interpretation that the proviso to Section 24(2) is a proviso to Section 24(1)(b), set asi… |
| Reporting | reportable |
| Acts | Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 |
| Sections | Section 24 of the 2013 Act |
These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.
How to refer to this record
These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.
- Registry identifier: Diary No. 18941/2016
- Court and date: Supreme Court of India, 27 February 2019
- Permanent address of this record: https://courtmesh.ai/judgment/supreme-court/2019/delhi-development-authority-vs-virender-lal-bahri-2019-40355a
Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.
Inside the full case file
See the rest of this matter
The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:
- The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
- Every order and document on the record, ready to read
- The full judgment exactly as the court published it
- AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon
Free account. No card. About a minute to create.
Create a free accountThe same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.