CourtMesh

EDAPPADI K. PALANISWAMI vs T.T.V. DHINAKARAN

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 7 February 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 4/2019. The bench of 2 comprised Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Ajay Rastogi.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court vacated its earlier order and directed the Election Commission to process the a…". The record refers to 2 enactments, among them Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 and Representation of the People Act, 1951. 3 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 4/2019
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
PetitionerEDAPPADI K. PALANISWAMI
RespondentT.T.V. DHINAKARAN
DisposalThe Court vacated its earlier order and directed the Election Commission to process the application of respondent No.1,…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968
  • Representation of the People Act, 1951
Sections
  • Paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968
  • Paragraph 18 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968
  • Article 324 of the Constitution of India
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.