CourtMesh

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 23 October 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 8700/2016. The bench of 5 comprised Justice Indira Banerjee, Justice M.R. Shah, Justice Arun Mishra, Justice Vineet Saran and Justice S. Ravindra Bhat.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Case referred to larger Bench for detailed adjudication on the interpretation of Section…". The record refers to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 1 statutory provision is noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 8700/2016
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
PetitionerINDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RespondentMANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC.
DisposalCase referred to larger Bench for detailed adjudication on the interpretation of Section 24 of the Act of 2013
Reportingreportable
ActsRight to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
SectionsSection 24 of the Act of 2013

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.