CourtMesh

M/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 3 December 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 33953/2019. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice Aniruddha Bose.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals dismissed; High Court's order upheld". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. 14 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 33953/2019
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
PetitionerM/S EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD.
RespondentTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DisposalAppeals dismissed; High Court's order upheld
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
  • Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
  • Mineral Concession Rules, 1960
  • Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydrocarbons Energy Minerals) Rules, 2016
Sections
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
  • Section 14 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 8-A (6) of the MMDR Act, 1957
  • Section 30 of the MMDR Act, 1957
  • Section 65 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 66 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 69 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 179 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 60 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 18(f)(vi) of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 25 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 63 of the IBC, 2016
  • Section 180 of the IBC, 2016

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.