CourtMesh

M/S NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS) vs STATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPARTMENT

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 20 August 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 18935/2007. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice A.M. Khanwilkar.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeal dismissed, suit barred by limitation". The record refers to 5 enactments, among them Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Limitation Act, 1963. 8 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 18935/2007
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
PetitionerM/S NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS)
RespondentSTATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPARTMENT
DisposalAppeal dismissed, suit barred by limitation
Reportingreportable
Acts
Sections
  • Section 18(1) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
  • Section 20 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
  • Section 21 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
  • Section 24(2)(a) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
  • Section 34 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959
  • Section 60 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
  • Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963
  • Article 72 of Limitation Act, 1963

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.