CourtMesh

M.SIDDIQ (D) THR. LRS vs MAHANT SURESH DAS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 9 November 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 36350/2010. The bench of 5 comprised Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Chief Justice, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice Chief Justice.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Order for framing scheme, land allotment, and management, with affirmations of faith and…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958, Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 and Waqf Act, 1936. 10 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 36350/2010
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
PetitionerM.SIDDIQ (D) THR. LRS.
RespondentMAHANT SURESH DAS
DisposalOrder for framing scheme, land allotment, and management, with affirmations of faith and legal rights
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958
  • Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991
  • Waqf Act, 1936
  • Waqf Act, 1990
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908
  • Constitution of India, 1950
Sections
  • Section 45 of Indian Evidence Act
  • Section 57 of Indian Evidence Act
  • Section 81 of Indian Evidence Act
  • Section 110 of Indian Evidence Act
  • Section 11 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908
  • Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code
  • Order XXVI of Civil Procedure Code
  • Section 75 of Civil Procedure Code
  • Section 92 of Civil Procedure Code
  • Article 142 of the Constitution

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.