CourtMesh

ROJER MATHEW vs SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD AND ORS CHIEF MANAGER

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 13 November 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 9680/2017. The bench of 5 comprised Justice Chief Justice, Justice Chief Justice, Justice Chief Justice, Justice Deepak Gupta and Justice Ranjan Gogoi.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017, and the Rules framed thereunder are struck down as unc…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Finance Act, 2017, Companies Act, 2013 and Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. 40 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 9680/2017
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
PetitionerROJER MATHEW
RespondentSOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD AND ORS CHIEF MANAGER
DisposalPart XIV of the Finance Act, 2017, and the Rules framed thereunder are struck down as unconstitutional; existing appoin…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Finance Act, 2017
  • Companies Act, 2013
  • Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007
  • National Green Tribunal Act, 2010
  • Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
  • Income Tax Act, 1961
  • Various other statutes amended by Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017
Sections
  • Article 110
  • Articles 323A and 323B of the Constitution
  • Article 226
  • Article 136
  • Article 147
  • Article 148
  • Article 149
  • Article 150
  • Article 151
  • Article 152
  • Article 153
  • Article 154
  • Article 155
  • Article 156
  • Article 157
  • Article 158
  • Article 159
  • Article 160
  • Article 161
  • Article 162
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues
LockedArgumentsLockedHoldingLockedLegal PrinciplesLockedCase History with OrdersLockedSimilar CasesLockedFull judgment text

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.