CourtMesh

UNION OF INDIA vs TARSEM SINGH

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 8773/2019
Date of decision
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
DisposalDeclaration of unconstitutionality of Section 3J; directions to apply 2013 Act benefits to highway acquisitions
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • National Highways Act, 1956
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894
  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
  • Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952
  • Defence of India Act, 1971
Sections
  • Section 3A
  • Section 3D
  • Section 3G
  • Section 3H
  • Section 3J
  • Section 34
  • Section 37
  • Section 105
  • Section 113
  • Section 11
  • Section 4
  • Section 23
  • Section 24
  • Section 28
  • Section 31
  • Section 53
  • Section 67-71
  • Section 7(3)
  • Section 9
  • Section 30

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.