CourtMesh

VINAY EKNATH LAD vs CHIU MAO CHEN

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 18 December 2019. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 36789/2008. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice Deepak Gupta.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Remand for further factual investigation and re-judgment". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Transfer of Property Act, 1932, Indian Partnership Act, 1932 and Karnataka Stamp Act. 7 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 36789/2008
Date of decision
Decision year2019
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
PetitionerVINAY EKNATH LAD
RespondentCHIU MAO CHEN
DisposalRemand for further factual investigation and re-judgment
Reportingnon-reportable
Acts
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1932
  • Indian Partnership Act, 1932
  • Karnataka Stamp Act
Sections
  • Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act
  • Section 45(1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
  • Section 48 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932
  • Section 116 of the Evidence Act
  • Section 109 of the Transfer of Property Act
  • Section 40-C of the Karnataka Stamp Act
  • Section 17 of the Registration Act

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.