CourtMesh

ANKITA KAILASH KHANDELWAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 8 October 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 10713/2020. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Chief Justice, Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Justice Vineet Saran.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeal allowed; restrictions relaxed; appellants permitted to resume studies under condit…". The record refers to 5 enactments, among them Indian Penal Code, 1860, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1999. 7 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 10713/2020
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
PetitionerANKITA KAILASH KHANDELWAL
RespondentTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DisposalAppeal allowed; restrictions relaxed; appellants permitted to resume studies under conditions
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860
  • Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
  • Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1999
  • Medical Council of India Regulations, 2000
  • Medical Council of India Regulations, 2009
Sections
  • Section 174 of CrPC
  • Section 306 of IPC
  • Section 34 of IPC
  • Section 4 of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1999
  • Section 6 of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1999
  • Section 164 of CrPC
  • Section 22(1) of the Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.