CourtMesh

AVITEL POST STUDIOZ LIMITED AND ORS vs HSBC PI HOLDING (MAURITIUS) LIMITED

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 19 August 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 28591/2014. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Navin Sinha.

The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Companies Act, 2013. 5 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 28591/2014
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
PetitionerAVITEL POST STUDIOZ LIMITED AND ORS.
RespondentHSBC PI HOLDING (MAURITIUS) LIMITED
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860
  • Companies Act, 2013
Sections
  • Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Section 19 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Section 20 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.