CourtMesh

BANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY vs NANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 19 May 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 44237/2019. The bench of 2 comprised Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals allowed; High Court order set aside; directions to approach the State for prior a…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 and Prevention of Corruption Act. 5 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 44237/2019
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
PetitionerBANGALORE MYSORE INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY
RespondentNANDI INFRASTRUCTURE CORRIDOR ENTERPRISE LIMITED
DisposalAppeals allowed; High Court order set aside; directions to approach the State for prior approval
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961
  • Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966
  • Prevention of Corruption Act
  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
  • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
  • Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
  • Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976
  • Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 & 1965
Sections
  • Section 15 of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961
  • Clause 3.1.1, 3.2.3, 3.2.5, 3.2.6, 7.1, 7.2, 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6 of the Framework Agreement (FWA)
  • Clause 1.1.3 of the Tripartite Agreement dated 9.8.2002
  • Section 4A(1) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961
  • Section 18 of the Framework Agreement (FWA)

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.