CourtMesh

DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA vs AAM AADMI LOKMANCH

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 14 July 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 27371/2015. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice S. Ravindra Bhat.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court set aside the broad directions restricting construction near hills and quashed…". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. 8 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 27371/2015
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
PetitionerDIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
RespondentAAM AADMI LOKMANCH .
DisposalThe Court set aside the broad directions restricting construction near hills and quashed the notification under Section…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • National Green Tribunal Act, 2010
  • Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966
  • Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
  • Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
  • Highways Act, 1956
  • National Highways Authority of India Act, 1988
Sections
  • Section 14
  • Section 15
  • Section 16
  • Section 17
  • Section 18
  • Section 19
  • Section 33
  • Section 154

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.