CourtMesh

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY vs MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 6 March 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 8700/2016. The bench of 5 comprised Justice M.R. Shah, Justice Arun Mishra, Justice Vineet Saran, Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Justice Indira Banerjee.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The proceedings pending as on the enforcement date, which have not culminated in lawful p…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and General Clauses Act, 1897. 5 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 8700/2016
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
  • HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
PetitionerINDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RespondentMANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC.
DisposalThe proceedings pending as on the enforcement date, which have not culminated in lawful possession or payment of compen…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894
  • General Clauses Act, 1897
Sections
  • Section 24 of the Act of 2013
  • Section 114 of the Act of 2013
  • Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897
  • Section 16, 17, 31, 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
  • Section 11, 12, 13, 23, 23(1A), 24, 69, 101 of the Act of 2013

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.