CourtMesh

KANTARU RAJEEVARU vs INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION THR.ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MS. BHAKTI PASRIJA AND ORS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 10 February 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 38452/2018. The bench of 7 comprised Justice L. Nageswara Rao, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Chief Justice, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice Chief Justice and Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Court dismissed the review petitions and upheld the procedural authority to refer que…". The record refers to the Constitution of India. 10 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 38452/2018
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
  • HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
PetitionerKANTARU RAJEEVARU
RespondentINDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION THR.ITS GENERAL SECRETARY MS. BHAKTI PASRIJA AND ORS.
DisposalThe Court dismissed the review petitions and upheld the procedural authority to refer questions of law to larger benche…
Reportingnon-reportable
ActsConstitution of India
Sections
  • Articles 25
  • Articles 26
  • Article 142
  • Article 137
  • Order XLVII of Supreme Court Rules, 2013
  • Order XXXII
  • Order XLVII Rule 1
  • Order VI Rule 2
  • Order XXI
  • Order XXII
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.