CourtMesh

VINOD GIRI GOSWAMI vs THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 14 February 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 1994/2012. The bench of 2 comprised Justice L. Nageswara Rao and Justice Hemant Gupta.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeals allowed; High Court judgment set aside; seniority list upheld as per rules". The record refers to 4 enactments, among them Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005, U.P. Civil Servant (Executive Branch) Rules, 1982 and Uttaranchal Government Servant Seniority Rules, 2002. 7 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 1994/2012
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
PetitionerVINOD GIRI GOSWAMI .
RespondentTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
DisposalAppeals allowed; High Court judgment set aside; seniority list upheld as per rules
Reportingnon-reportable
Acts
  • Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005
  • U.P. Civil Servant (Executive Branch) Rules, 1982
  • Uttaranchal Government Servant Seniority Rules, 2002
  • Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2000
Sections
  • Rule 24(4) of the Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005
  • Rule 20(2) of the U.P. Civil Servant (Executive Branch) Rules, 1982
  • Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2000
  • Rule 16 of the Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005
  • Rule 23 of the U.P. Civil Servant (Executive Branch) Rules, 1982
  • Rule 4(h) of the Uttaranchal Government Servant Seniority Rules, 2002
  • Proviso to Rule 24(4) of the 2005 Rules

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.