CourtMesh

VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 15 June 2020. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 18989/2009. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Justice Chief Justice and Justice Vineet Saran.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Appeal dismissed; judgment upheld". The record refers to 6 enactments, among them Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Transfer of Property Act, 1882. 40 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 18989/2009
Date of decision
Decision year2020
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
PetitionerVINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA
RespondentSTATE OF GUJARAT .
DisposalAppeal dismissed; judgment upheld
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948
  • Indian Succession Act, 1925
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
  • Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879
  • Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999
  • Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974
  • Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955
  • M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959
  • Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950
  • Bombay Devasthan Inams Abolition Act, 1969
  • Gujarat Devasthan Inams Abolition Act, 1969
Sections
  • Section 43
  • Section 63
  • Section 21
  • Section 24
  • Section 27
  • Section 15
  • Section 73AA
  • Section 73A
  • Section 73
  • Section 68
  • Section 71-A
  • Section 4
  • Section 5
  • Section 3
  • Section 4B
  • Section 8
  • Section 9
  • Section 9A
  • Section 9B
  • Section 9C

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.