CourtMesh

ANAND KUMAR TIWARI vs HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 12 August 2021. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 21029/2018. The bench of 2 comprised Justice Aniruddha Bose and Justice L. Nageswara Rao.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Petitions dismissed; seniority to be re-determined based on 2017 Rules with retrospective…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Madhya Pradesh Uchchtar Nyayik Sewa (Bharti Tatha Seva Sharten) Niyam, 1994, Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2017 and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994. 5 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 21029/2018
Date of decision
Decision year2021
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
PetitionerANAND KUMAR TIWARI
RespondentHIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
DisposalPetitions dismissed; seniority to be re-determined based on 2017 Rules with retrospective effect
Reportingnon-reportable
Acts
  • Madhya Pradesh Uchchtar Nyayik Sewa (Bharti Tatha Seva Sharten) Niyam, 1994
  • Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2017
  • Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994
Sections
  • Rule 11 of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2017
  • Rule 5 of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2017
  • Rule 5 of the Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994
  • Rule 11(1) and 11(2) of the 2017 Rules
  • Rule 12 of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Condition of Service) Rules, 1961

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.