CourtMesh

JAMIA MASJID vs K.V.RUDRAPPA (D) TH.LRS

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 23 September 2021. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 15209/2012. The bench of 3 comprised Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Chief Justice and Justice B.V. Nagarathna.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and remanded the…". The record refers to 3 enactments, among them Wakf Act 1954, Wakf Rules framed under the Wakf Act, 1965 and Code of Civil Procedure 1908. 5 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 15209/2012
Date of decision
Decision year2021
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH
  • HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
  • HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
PetitionerJAMIA MASJID
RespondentK.V.RUDRAPPA (D) TH.LRS
DisposalThe Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and remanded the case for a full trial on the m…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Wakf Act 1954
  • Wakf Rules framed under the Wakf Act, 1965
  • Code of Civil Procedure 1908
Sections
  • Section 6 of the Wakf Act 1954
  • Section 11 of the CPC
  • Order 23 Rule 1 CPC
  • Order 23 Rule 3A CPC
  • Section 92 CPC
Provisions on CourtMesh

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.