CourtMesh

JAYPEE KENSINGTON BOULEVARD APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs NBCC (INDIA) LTD

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 24 March 2021. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 14741/2020. The bench of 3 comprised Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice Krishna Murari and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "Partially allowed, with directions to reconsider and modify the resolution plan within ex…". The record refers to 5 enactments, among them Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, RERA (Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016) and Companies Act, 2013. 23 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 14741/2020
Date of decision
Decision year2021
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
PetitionerJAYPEE KENSINGTON BOULEVARD APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
RespondentNBCC (INDIA) LTD
DisposalPartially allowed, with directions to reconsider and modify the resolution plan within extended timelines
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
  • RERA (Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016)
  • Companies Act, 2013
  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949
Sections
  • Section 7
  • Section 12
  • Section 13
  • Section 15
  • Section 16
  • Section 18
  • Section 21
  • Section 22
  • Section 23
  • Section 25
  • Section 25A
  • Section 26
  • Section 27
  • Section 28
  • Section 30
  • Section 31
  • Section 32
  • Section 33
  • Section 53
  • Section 61

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.