CourtMesh

LALIT KUMAR JAIN vs UNION OF INDIA

Supreme Court of IndiaJudgment

About this record

The Supreme Court of India decided this matter on 21 May 2021. The registry identifies it as Diary No. 26016/2020. The bench of 2 comprised Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Justice L. Nageswara Rao.

The disposal recorded by the registry is "The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions and upheld the validity of the impugned notific…". The record refers to 5 enactments, among them Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 12 statutory provisions are noted on the record.

Court record

Court record details
CourtSupreme Court of India
Record typeJudgment
Diary numberDiary No. 26016/2020
Date of decision
Decision year2021
Bench
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
PetitionerLALIT KUMAR JAIN
RespondentUNION OF INDIA
DisposalThe Supreme Court dismissed the petitions and upheld the validity of the impugned notification, affirming that it was w…
Reportingreportable
Acts
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
  • Indian Contract Act, 1872
  • Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
  • Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909
  • Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920
Sections
  • Section 1(3)
  • Section 2(e)
  • Section 78
  • Section 79
  • Section 94 to 187
  • Section 239(2)(g), (h), (i), (m) to (zc), (zn) to (zs), and Section 249
  • Section 60
  • Section 179
  • Section 128
  • Section 133
  • Section 140
  • Section 31

These are the case details as recorded by the court. CourtMesh does not alter court records. Every linked value opens the other records that share it.

How to refer to this record

These identifiers come from the court record itself. The address below is permanent: if the page is ever renamed, the old address keeps redirecting to it, so it is safe to cite in a note, a brief or a footnote.

Need this as data, not as a page?This record is one of many CourtMesh holds for the Supreme Court of India. The Indian court cases API serves the same records over JSON, with API documentation and plans and pricing. See also Supreme Court of India data coverage.

Inside the full case file

LockedHeadnoteUnlocks with a free account
LockedKey Facts
LockedLegal Issues

See the rest of this matter

The court record above is free, and it stays free. A free CourtMesh account opens the rest of the file:

  • The complete timeline of the matter, hearing by hearing
  • Every order and document on the record, ready to read
  • The full judgment exactly as the court published it
  • AI analysis: what was decided, on what reasoning, in minutes instead of an afternoon

Free account. No card. About a minute to create.

Create a free account

The same account unlocks all of CourtMesh Research: AI-powered search across 300 million+ Indian court records, a research agent that finds and reads the case law for you, and every judgment page like this one, in full.